The nation made its 2nd attempt at creating a main bank in 1816 following an financial downturn. But, choose its predecessor, the institution’s charter was no renewed.

You are watching: What was a major cause of the panic of 1819 apex


This 1840s lithographtitled "Custom House, so late U.S. Bank" mirrors the building that housed the 2nd Bank.Image via Library agency of Philadelphia

In the years leading as much as the war of 1812, the U.S. Economic climate had to be on the upswing. The war through Britain, however, disrupted international trade. As among the united States’ largest trading partners, Britain offered its marine to blockade U.S. Profession with various other nations. The war prevented U.S. Farmers and also manufacturers native exporting merchandise, clogged U.S. Merchants and also fisherman from sailing the high seas, and curtailed federal federal government revenues, which were derived mainly indigenous tariffs on trade. Through 1815, the joined States discovered itself heavily in debt, much like that had gone to the finish of the Revolutionary war thirty years earlier.

In January 1815, the united States had been there is no a national bank for nearly four years. Many people thought that a successor would again administer relief because that the country’s ailing economic climate and aid in payment its war debt. Six males figured prominently in establishing this brand-new entity, typically referred to as the second Bank the the united States: the financiers john Jacob Astor, David Parish, Stephen Girard, and also Jacob Barker; Alexander Dallas, who would come to be secretary of the Treasury in 1814; and also Rep. Man C. Calhoun of southern Carolina. These men thought the reestablishing a national bank would deal with some of the country’s financial woes. In particular, Astor, Parish, Girard, and Barker – together lenders and financiers -- felt that a national bank would regain a stable currency, thereby staying clear of bouts that inflation and also insuring their company interests.

Establishing a second National Bank

Despite broad support because that reestablishing a nationwide bank, the roadway to re-creation was not smooth. In January 1814, Congress got a petition signed by 150 businessmen from brand-new York City, urging the legislative body to develop a 2nd national bank. In February, and also again in November, Calhoun placed forth plan to create a bank that would be headquartered in the district of Columbia, but his bills did not pass.

In April 1814, chairman James Madison, who had opposed the production of the first Bank of the United claims in 1791, reluctantly admitted come the require for one more national bank. He believed a bank was necessary to finance the war with Britain. Yet later the year, progress in tranquility negotiations led Madison to retract his support for the proposed nationwide bank.

After tranquility with Britain come in 1815, conference rejected new efforts to develop the bank. In the months the followed, however, the commonwealth government’s financial position deteriorated amid a more comprehensive economic downturn. Many state-chartered banks had stopped redeeming their notes, which convinced Madison and his advisers that the moment had concerned move the country toward a much more uniform, stable record currency. In his annual report, Dallas again referred to as for the facility of a national bank. After much debate and also a pair of added attempts, Madison finally signed in April 1816 an act establishing the second Bank the the unified States.

Bank Structure and Operations

The bank opened for company in Philadelphia in January 1817. It had much in common with its forerunner, consisting of its functions and structure. It would act together fiscal agent for the federal federal government — holding its deposits, do its payments, and also helping it worry debt to the general public — and it would issue and redeem banknotes and also keep state banks’ issuance of note in check. Also like that predecessor, the bank had a twenty-year charter and also operated together a commercial financial institution that accepted deposits and also made loans to the public, both businesses and also individuals. The board consisted of twenty-five directors, with 5 appointed by the president and also confirmed by the Senate.

The capitalization for the second Bank to be $35 million, considerably higher than the $10 million underwriting of the an initial Bank. Subscriptions walk on sale in July 1816, and also the sale period was set at 3 weeks. To do it much easier for investor to buy subscriptions, sales were organized in twenty cities. After 3 weeks, $3 million of scrips remained unsold, so Philadelphia banker Stephen Girard to buy them.

The Bank’s with was much greater 보다 that of its predecessor. That branches ultimately totaled twenty-five in number, contrasted to only eight for the an initial Bank. The considerable branch network aided the country’s from the west expansion and its financial growth in number of ways. The branches noted credit to businesses and farmers, and these loans helped finance the production of items and farming output as well as the shipment of these products to domestic and foreign destinations. Moreover, the network aided move the money deposit in the branches to various other parts the the nation, facilitating both the government’s capability to do payments and also the branches’ ability to supply credit.

See more: Write The Number 45 As A Product Of Prime Factors Of 45? Factors Of 45

Unlike modern main banks, the financial institution did not set monetary policy as we recognize it today. It additionally did no regulate, host the to make reservation of, or act together a lender that last will for other financial institutions. Nonetheless, its prominence as one of the biggest U.S. Corporations and its branches’ vast geographic place in the broadening economy allowed it to command a rudimentary monetary policy. The Bank’s notes, donate by an extensive gold reserves, provided the nation a an ext stable nationwide currency. By controlling its lending policies and also the flow of funds v its accounts, the financial institution could — and also did — transform the supply of money and also credit in the economy and also hence the level that interest rates charged to borrowers.