include to folder introducing Folders! find out just how you can intelligently organize her Flashcards.


You are watching: The following are advantages of the sml approach

Use LEFT and also RIGHT arrow keys to navigate in between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to upper and lower reversal the card;

H to display hint;

A reads message to speech;


that is the minimum price of return the firm must earn as whole on its existing assets. If that earns an ext thanthis, value is created.
In calculating the WACC, if you had actually to use publication values because that either blame or equity, which would certainly you choose? Why?
If you have the right to borrow every the money you require for a task at 6%, doesn\"t the follow the 6% is your expense of resources for the project?
Interest price is tax-deductible. Over there is no difference between pretax and also aftertax equity costs.
What room the benefits of using the DCF version for determining the cost of same capital? What room the disadvantages? What certain piece of information do you require to discover the cost of equity using this model? What are several of the methods in i m sorry you can get this estimate?
The primary advantage of the DCF version is that is simplicity. The method is disadvantaged in the (1)the design is applicable only to that company that in reality pay dividends; numerous do not; (2) even if a firmdoes salary dividends, the DCF design requires a constant dividend development rate forever; (3) theestimated price of equity from this method is an extremely sensitive to alters in g, i m sorry is a an extremely uncertainparameter; and also (4) the model does not explicitly think about risk, although danger is implicitly consideredto the level that the market has impounded the pertinent risk of the stock right into its sector price. Whilethe re-superstructure price and also most current dividend have the right to be observed in the market, the dividend growth ratemust be estimated. Two common methods that estimating g are to use analysts’ earnings and payoutforecasts or to recognize some suitable average historical g indigenous the firm’s available data.
What are the benefits of utilizing the SML method to finding the expense of same capital? What room the disadvantages? What details pieces of information do you need to use this method? Are every one of these variables observable, or carry out they need to be estimated? What are several of the ways in which you could get these estimates?
two primary advantages of the SML strategy are that the model explicitly incorporates the relevantrisk of the stock and also the method is much more widely applicable than is the DCF model, due to the fact that the SMLdoesn’t make any type of assumptions around the firm’s dividends. The main disadvantages the the SMLmethod are (1) 3 parameters (the risk-free rate, the expected return ~ above the market, and beta) mustbe estimated, and (2) the method essentially uses historic information to estimate these parameters.The risk-free price is usually estimated to be the yield on very short maturity T-bills and is, hence,observable; the market risk premium is usually estimated from historic risk premiums and, hence,is no observable. The share beta, i m sorry is unobservable, is usually estimated either by determiningsome average historic beta indigenous the firm and the market’s return data, or by utilizing beta estimatesprovided by experts and invest firms.
how do you identify the ideal cost of debt for a company? go it do a distinction if the company\"s debt is privately put as protest to being publicly traded? exactly how would you estimate the cost of debt for a firm whose only debt issures space privately hosted by institutional investors?
The suitable aftertax cost of debt to the firm is the interest price it would have to pay if itwere to issue brand-new debt today. Hence, if the YTM on impressive bonds the the agency is observed,the agency has precise estimate the its cost of debt. If the blame is privately-placed, the firmcould still estimate its cost of blame by (1) looking at the price of blame for comparable firms in similar riskclasses, (2) looking in ~ the mean debt price for firms through the exact same credit rating (assuming thefirm’s private debt is rated), or (3) consulting experts and invest bankers. Even if the debt ispublicly traded, an additional complication is when the firm has more than one issue outstanding;these issues rarely have actually the very same yield since no two issues are ever completely homogeneous.
intend the president of Bedlam Produces has actually hired girlfriend to determine if the firm\"s cost of debt and cost of equity capital.a) the stock right now sells because that $50 every share, and also the div per share will certainly prob be around $5. Prez suggests \"It will expense us $5 per share to usage the stockholders\" money this year, therefore the cost of equity is same to 10% ($5/50).\" What\"s wrong through this conclusion?b) based on the many recent jae won statements, Bedlam Products\" complete liabilities are $8 million. Complete interest expense for the coming year will be about $1 mil. Prezz because of this reasons, \"We owe 8 mil, and we will pay 1 mil interest. Therefore, our expense of blame is 1 mil/ 8 mil = 12.5%. What\"s wrong with this conclusion?c) based upon his own analysis, Prez is recommending boost its use of equity financing because \"debt costs 12.5%, but equity costs only 10%; for this reason equity is cheaper.\" skipping all various other issues, what execute you think around the conclusion that the expense of equity is much less than the expense of debt?
a. This just considers the dividend yield component of the compelled return ~ above equity.b. This is the existing yield only, not the promised productivity to maturity. In addition, the is based upon thebook value of the liability, and it ignores taxes.c. Equity is inherently much more risky than debt (except, perhaps, in the unusual instance where a firm’sassets have a an adverse beta). For this reason, the expense of equity exceeds the price of debt. If taxesare thought about in this case, it have the right to be watched that at reasonable taxation rates, the price of same doesexceed the price of debt.
Both Dow Chemical and also Superior Oil space thinking the investing in natural gas wells near Houston. Both suppliers are every equity financed. Dow and Superior room looking at the same projects. They\"ve analyzed their corresponding investments, which would involve a negative cash circulation now and positive intended cash operation in the future. These cash flows would be the same for both firms. No debt would be offered to finance the projects. Both service providers estimate that their projects would have an NPV that 1 mil in ~ 18% discount rate and also a -1.1 mil NPV at a 22% discount rate. Dow has actually a beta the 1.25, conversely, Superior has actually a beta of .75. The supposed risk premium on the industry is 8%, and also risk cost-free bonds space yiedling 12%. Need to either firm proceed? Or Both? define
RSup = .12 + .75(.08) = .1800 or 18.00%Both must proceed. The ideal discount price does not rely on which firm is investing;it counts on the hazard of the project. Due to the fact that Superior is in the business, that is closer come a pure play.Therefore, its expense of capital should be used. Through an 18% expense of capital, the project has an NPV of$1 million regardless of that takes it.
Under what scenarios would it be ideal for a for sure to usage diff prices of funding for that is diff operating divisions? If the as whole firm WACC were supplied as the hurdle rate for every divisions, would certainly the riskier divisions or the an ext conservative departments tend to get most the the invest projects? Why? IF you to be to try to calculation the proper cost of capital for diff divisions, what problems could you encounter? What room two methods you could use to build a unstable estimate for each division\"s price of capital?
If the various operating departments were in much different risk classes, climate separate cost of capitalfigures have to be supplied for the different divisions; the usage of a single, overall cost of funding would beinappropriate. If the single hurdle rate were used, riskier departments would tend to receive an ext fundsfor investment projects, because their return would exceed the hurdle rate regardless of the reality that they mayactually plot listed below the SML and, hence, be unprofitable tasks on a risk-adjusted basis. Thetypical difficulty encountered in estimating the expense of capital for a division is the it rarely has actually itsown securities traded ~ above the market, so it is an overwhelming to watch the market’s valuation the the risk ofthe division. Two usual ways around this room to usage a pure play proxy because that the division, or come usesubjective adjustments the the as whole firm hurdle rate based upon the perceived risk the the division.
describe what is supposed by company risk and also financial risk. Suppose firm A has higher biz threat than for sure B. IS that true that Firm A additionally has a higher cost of same capital? describe
service risk is the equity risk arising from the nature that the firm’s operation activity, and also is directlyrelated to the systematic risk the the this firm assets. Financial danger is the equity danger that is early out entirelyto the firm’s chosen funding structure. Together financial leverage, or the usage of blame financing, increases,so go financial danger and, hence, the overall risk of the equity. Thus, for sure B could have a highercost of equity if that uses better leverage.
exactly how would you answer in the following debate?q: isn\"t that true the the riskiness the a firm\"s equity will rise if the firm increases its use of blame financing?a: yes, that\"s the essence of the propq: and also isn\"t the true that, as a firm rises its usage of borrowing, the likelihood of default increases, thereby enhancing the threat of the firms debt?a: yesq: in other words, raised borrowing rises the danger of the equity and the debt?a: yesq: well, offered the certain only supplies debt and equity financing, and also given the the dangers of both are boosted by increased borrowing, go it not follow that boosting debt increases the all at once risk the the firm and also therefore reduce the worth of the firm?a: ??
No, it no follow. While it is true that the equity and also debt prices are rising, the key thing toremember is the the expense of debt is still much less than the cost of equity. Because we room using more andmore debt, the WACC does no necessarily rise.
due to the fact that many relevant components such together bankruptcy costs, tax asymmetries, and firm costs cannoteasily be figured out or quantified, it’s almost impossible to determine the an accurate debt/equity ratiothat maximizes the worth of the firm. However, if the firm’s cost of brand-new debt suddenly becomesmuch more expensive, it’s probably true that the certain is too highly leveraged.
describe the observed resources structures provided in Table 17.7. What do you an alert about the types of sectors with respect come their average debt-equity ratios? are certain varieties of industries more likely to be very leveraged 보다 others? What room some feasible reasons because that this it was observed segmentation? carry out the operating results and tax background of the firms pat a role? How about their future revenue prospects? describe
The much more capital extensive industries, such as airlines, cable television, and electric utilities, tend touse better financial leverage. Also, markets with much less predictable future earnings, together ascomputers or drugs, have tendency to use much less financial leverage. Such industries additionally have a higherconcentration that growth and also startup firms. Overall, the general propensity is for firms withidentifiable, tangible assets and also relatively much more predictable future revenue to use an ext debtfinancing. This are typically the firms v the biggest need for exterior financing and the greatestlikelihood that benefiting indigenous the interest tax shelter.
Why is the usage of blame financing described as jae won \"leverage.\"?
It’s dubbed leverage (or “gearing” in the UK) due to the fact that it magnifies benefit or losses.
What is homemade leverage?
Homemade leverage refers to the use of get loan on the an individual level together opposed come the corporatelevel.
As pointed out in the text, part firms have actually filed for bankruptcy due to the fact that of really or likely litigation-related losses. Is the a appropriate use the the bankruptcy process?
One price is the the ideal to file for bankruptcy is a an useful asset, and also the financial manager actsin shareholders’ finest interest by regulating this asset in methods that maximize that is value. To the extentthat a bankruptcy filing stays clear of “a race to the courthouse steps,” it would certainly seem to it is in a reasonableuse the the process.
Firms periodically use the threat of a bankruptcy filing to force creditors come renegotiate terms. Critics argue that in such situations the for sure is utilizing bankruptcy a sword quite than a shield. Is this an ethical tactic?
together in the ahead question, it could be suggested that utilizing bankruptcy laws as a sword may simply bethe best use of the asset. Creditors are aware at the time a loan is made of the possibility ofbankruptcy, and the interest charged incorporates it.
As pointed out in the text, Continental airline filed because that bankruptcy, at the very least in part, as a means of reducing job costs. Whether this relocate was ethical, or proper, to be hotly debated. Provide both sides of the argument.

See more: M Is It Illegal To Shoot Someone With A Paintball Gun At Someone?

One next is that continent was walk to walk bankrupt because its expenses made that uncompetitive. Thebankruptcy filing allowed Continental come restructure and keep flying. The other side is thatContinental abused the bankruptcy code. Fairly than renegotiate job agreements, Continentalsimply abrogated them come the detriment of that is employees. In this, and the last several, questions, animportant thing to store in mental is the the bankruptcy code is a production of law, not economics. Astrong dispute can always be made that making the best use the the bankruptcy code is no differentfrom, because that example, minimizing count by making best use of the tax code. Indeed, a strong case deserve to bemade the it is the financial administer duty to do so. As the case of continent illustrates, the codecan be readjusted if socially undesirable outcomes room a problem.